If the Shipowner has failed to carry out a term of a time charter-party whereby he undertakes to maintain the vessel in a seaworthy state，this only（）the Charterer to sue him for damages，and not to repudiate the charter-party.

To render the（）liable，the shipowners must show that the proximate cause of the detention or expense was trading to a river with a bar or to a port with a bar.

That the Shipowner has broken a condition precedent will（）the Charterer from the liability to provide a cargo.

The master’s authority to act in the interests of the cargo owner is part of his general authorityas servant of the Shipowner，and therefore（）will be liable if the master abuses his powers.

The fixing of a canceling date on a charter-party merely（）warning to the Shipowner that non-arrival by this date may result so as to entitle the Charterer to rescind.

The right to limit liability in connection with the ship（）also extended to Charterers and any person interested in or in possession of the vessel and，in particular，any manager or operator of her.

We must take the Charterer’s benefit（）full consideration．

If the Shipowner makes an innocent misrepresentation which induces the Charterer to sign the contract，the Charterer may be entitled to（）the charter-party.

The importance of the distinction between a charter by demise and a charter party proper（）that under the former the master is the agent of the Charterer，not of the Shipowner.

It is not the Charterer’s duty that（）.