Both the Shipowner and the Charterer will be discharged from their obligations under the charter-party if it（）frustrated.

A breach of the（）undertaking of seaworthiness at the port of loading entitles the Charterer to refuse to load.

The carrier has，before and at the beginning of the voyage，to（）due diligence to make the ship seaworthy.

Apart from special contract or statute every Shipowner is（）a liability akin to that of a common carrier，irrespective of whether the goods were shipped by a Charterer or on a general ship.

An action for indemnity against a third person may（）after the expiration of the year if brought within the time allowed by the law of the court seized of the case.

If the Charterer nominates an unsafe port and the ship is damaged through going there，（） will be liable for the damage，subject to that the master acts reasonably in going there.

The merchant undertakes that no claim or allegation shall be made against any servant，agent or subcontractor of the carrier which（）to impose upon any of them or any liability whatsoever in connection with the goods.

（）the Charterer seeks to say that the contract has been frustrated or that there has been an anticipatory breach which entitles him to rescind，then he has such rights as are given him at common law.

If the place named for the loading is simply a port or dock，notice of readiness may be given as soon as the ship arrives（）although she is not in the particular spot where the loading is to take place.

Where a charter-party stated that errors of navigation were excluded，it was held that these words referred to non-negligent errors，and（）not wide enough to embrace negligent errors.